Difference between revisions of "Projects:PinePhone Daily Driver Distributions Testing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
My results from testing of various distributions with the [[PinePhone]] to fulfill the [[Projects:PinePhone Daily Driver]]. | My results from testing of various distributions with the [[PinePhone]] to fulfill the [[Projects:PinePhone Daily Driver]]. | ||
| + | == Testing Results == | ||
=== [[Mobian]] === | === [[Mobian]] === | ||
==== Pros and Cons ==== | ==== Pros and Cons ==== | ||
Revision as of 02:01, 9 September 2020
My results from testing of various distributions with the PinePhone to fulfill the Projects:PinePhone Daily Driver.
Contents
Testing Results
Mobian
Pros and Cons
- [+] Debian (almost as good as Arch Linux)
- [+] Aims to be as upstream as possible, built from source
- [+] Usually features the newest features
- [+] Most reliable so far
postmarketOS
Pros and Cons
- [+] Alpine Linux
- [+] Easily customizable (thanks to pmbootstrap)
- [+] Full Device Encryption
- [–] Seems to often lag behind other popular distros when it comes to supporting new features.
UBports
Pros and Cons
- [+] Usually polished
- [+] Built via debos from source
- [–] [–] read-only file systems, not intended to be modified by the user
sxmo
Pros and Cons
- [+] built on top of postmarketOS (i.e. Alpine Linux)
- [+] tiling window manager
- [–] [–] kills power/volume buttons easily
- [–] X11 instead of Wayland
- [–] smaller community
Arch Linux ARM
Pros and Cons
- [+] Arch Linux
- [–] Missing some of the newest features
- [–] Often breaks